🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed positions for Indigenous council members on New Zealand councils is set to be slashed by more than half, after a controversial legislative amendment that forced local governments to submit the fate of hard-earned Māori seats to a public vote.

Historical Context on Māori Wards

Māori wards, which may have one or more councillors depending on demographic data, were established in 2001 to give Māori electors the choice to elect a assured Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Originally, councils were only able to create a Indigenous seat by initially submitting it to a community referendum in their region. Local populations frequently devoted considerable time building community backing and pushing their local governments to create Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government allowed municipal authorities to set up a Māori ward without initially mandating them to put it to a public vote.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, saying communities ought to determine whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change mandated local authorities that had created a electoral district under Labour’s rules to conduct decisive public votes concurrently with the municipal polls, which concluded on October 11. Of 42 councils taking part in the public vote, 17 voted to keep their wards, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – revealing numerous areas opposed to reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes represented “a crucial move in reinstating community self-determination.”

Opposition parties however have criticised the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the coalition government has ushered in sweeping rollbacks to measures intended to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has said it aims to end “race-based” approaches, and asserts it is dedicated to enhancing results for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the public votes were divided down city-country divisions – six of the seven urban centers required to vote supported Indigenous seats, while rural regions leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

The recent municipal polls recorded the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with less than a third of eligible voters casting a vote, leading to demands for reform.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Councils are able to create different electoral districts – such as rural wards – without first requiring a community ballot. The different conditions applied to Indigenous representation suggested the administration was singling out Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement concerned the 17 areas that voted to retain their seats.